Legal Opinion

Herriott v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1972No. 42051PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.

Eligibility to take Seattle’s civil service examinations is limited to citizens of the United States. This appeal involves the validity of provisions in the city’s charter and civil service rules which create such limitation.

*50Both appellants are aliens who lawfully reside in the United States and who have applied to become naturalized citizens. Each is a taxpayer of King County, Washington. Both are “provisionally” employed by the city as transit operators and each is a competent worker. Their duties 'are such that they can be performed as well by them as by citizens. No issue of security is…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. Washington Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Harmon v. McNuttWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Nielsen v. Washington State Bar Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re the Personal Restraint of WhiteselWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. City of Seattle v. SlackWashington Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API