Legal Opinion

Yantsin v. City of Aberdeen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1959No. 35040PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Quaere: Does the suspension of a member of a police department under a provision in a civil service ordinance reading,

“ . . . Nothing in this section shall limit the power of an officer to suspend, without pay, a subordinate for a period not exceeding thirty (30) days.”

constitute a violation of his constitutional right not to be deprived of property without due process of law?

For our present purposes, it is assumed that the suspension was without cause, and that the officer suspended had no right of review.

Answer: No. Due process of law is not applicable unless. one is being deprived of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Thompson v. MortonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ludolph v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Perez v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Price v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State Ex Rel. Ausburn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Edgar v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Schwebke v. Lutheran Social ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Danielson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Ass'n of Capitol Powerhouse Engineers v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Nostrand v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1961

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API