Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Erling Bros.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1933No. File No. 7509PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This action was instituted to recover upon a promissory note and to foreclose a chattel mortgage given to secure payment of the note. The defendants in their answer admit the execution and delivery of the note and mortgage, that the note has not been paid, and that the chattel mortgage is a first lien upon the property described in the complaint, but by -way of counterclaim alleged that the defendants made fraudulent representations and warranties, relied upon by the defendants, concerning the sale of sheep upon which transaction plaintiff’s note and mortgage are predicated. The plaintiff,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BroomalNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Danbury State Bank v. LeachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Byrne v. McKeachieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Johnson Service Co. v. KruseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Kenny v. McKenzieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dexter Horton Building Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Eggers v. EggersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. v. JensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Life Benefit, Inc. v. ForbragdSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  5. National Benefit Ass'n v. EidySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API