Johnson Service Co. v. Kruse
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to foreclose a. mechanic’s lien. The Johnson Service Company filed an answer to-the complaint, claiming a lien upon the premises described for $3,-362.10. The substance of the claim and of the counterclaim of defendant Edna D. Kruse will be found in the opinion. Defendant, Kruse demanded a jury trial upon certain specified issues and her motion was denied.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to foreclose a. mechanic’s lien. The Johnson Service Company filed an answer to-the complaint, claiming a lien upon the premises described for $3,-362.10. The substance of the claim and of the counterclaim of defendant Edna D. Kruse will be found in the opinion. Defendant, Kruse demanded a jury trial upon certain specified issues and her motion was denied. The case was tried before Steele, J„, who made findings in favor of the Johnson Service Company for the sum of $2,934.10, with interest, giving it a lien on the premises described co-ordinate…
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.
Action between William F. Behrens, as plaintiff, and Edna Kruse, .as defendant, for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien upon the Kadis■son Hotel, in Minneapolis, in which the Johnson Service Company • also undertook to foreclose a like lien against the same property. The Johnson Company alleged, omitting the formal parts of the pleading, that it contracted with Mrs. Kruse, the owner, to install a pneumatic system of temperature regulation in her hotel, for the price and of the reasonable value of $7,569, and thereafter also furnished certain extra labor and materials in connection with the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- In re the Estate of GarcelonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Busterud v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Hathaway v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Hasey v. McMullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Dover Lumber Co. v. CaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Mulroy v. Sioux Falls Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- DeWitt v. Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.