Legal Opinion

Kenny v. McKenzie

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1910PublishedCited by 15 opinions

On rehearing,

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This case is before us on rehearing. The opinion on the original hearing is reported in 23 S. D. 111, N. W. 781. Only two questions are presented at this time which seem to *487merit a reconsideration: First, the decision of this court, in the case of Burleigh v. Hecht, 22 S. D. 301, 117 N. W. 367, and, second, the decision in the case of Shelby v. Bowden, 16 S. D. 531, 94 N. W. 416, as affecting the rights of the parties-when applied to the case at bar. A restatement of the issues or facts is unnecessary, save in so far as they are involved in a consideration of .these particular questions. In…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Chase v. . PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Donahue v. MeisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Estrada v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Hughes v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dexter Horton Building Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Dailey v. RyanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Naccache v. TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Kraft v. Carson CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Brown v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API