Legal Opinion
Copeland v. Geddes Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n Retirement Income Plan
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided August 6, 1999No. 5:95-cv-01046PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
HURD, United States Magistrate Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Concetta Copeland (“Copeland” or “plaintiff’), is a resident of Camil-lus, New York, located within the Northern District of New York, and brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (“ERISA”). The defendant Geddes Federal Savings & Loan Association Retirement Income Plan (“Plan”) is an employee benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA § 1002(2)(A). The defendant Geddes Federal Savings and Loan Association (“Bank”), is the administrator of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Normann v. Amphenol Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Joyce v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hirt v. Equitable Retirement Plan for Employees, Managers & AgentsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Calder v. SBC Pension Benefit PlanDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008