Legal Opinion

County of Colusa v. Welch

California Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1898No. Sac. No. 350PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County. Frank Moody, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SEARLS, C.

This is an action brought by the county of Colusa, through its district attorney, to restrain the defendant, as treasurer of said county, from paying to one F. S. Sprague the sum of one thousand dollars upon a warrant issued by the *429auditor of said county on said treasurer and payable to said Sprague. A demurrer was sustained by the court to the second amended complaint of plaintiff, and a judgment entered in favor of defendant dissolving a restraining order theretofore issued therein, and for costs. Plaintiff appeals.

The action is brought under section 8 of the act of March 31,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hornblower v. DudenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Miles v. ThorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Lassen County v. ShinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Smith v. Mayor & Common Council of Sacramento CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Merriam v. BarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Graves & Houtchens v. Diamond Hill Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Valentine v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  4. Jacks v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Fitts v. Commission of City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API