Legal Opinion

Graves & Houtchens v. Diamond Hill Independent School Dist.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1922No. 10071PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

Appellants, Graves & Houtchens, sued appellee, the Diamond Hill Independent School District, to recover a balance of $890 alleged to be due upon a contract of employment to secure the defeat of a certain bill then pending before the Legislature of the state of. Texas, which, it was alleged, would, in the event of its passage, deprive the district of its existing liability to raise large amounts of funds by taxation necessary to a successful continuance of the public school in the district. Among other allegations, the plaintiffs averred that:

“On or about December 15, 1918, the defendant,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  4. Lyon v. . MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. Mills v. . MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Meyers v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'n v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Davis v. Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1987
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API