Legal Opinion

People v. Lane

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1982PublishedCited by 291 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wachtler, J.

In order to defeat a motion by the People to consolidate two indictments made on the ground that proof of one offense would be material and admissible upon a trial of the second offense (CPL 200.20, subd 2, par [b]; subd 4), a defendant claiming that he wishes to testify as to the first allegedly criminal transaction but not as to the second must make a convincing showing that he has both important testimony to give concerning one offense and a strong need to refrain from testifying as to the other. In that neither defendant here advanced sufficient information…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ShapiroNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. Dodge, New York County Courts1972

3Cited by291 opinions

  1. People v. CahillNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. BongarzoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Middleton v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. ShogaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. StreitferdtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

286 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API