People v. Lane
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Wachtler, J.
In order to defeat a motion by the People to consolidate two indictments made on the ground that proof of one offense would be material and admissible upon a trial of the second offense (CPL 200.20, subd 2, par [b]; subd 4), a defendant claiming that he wishes to testify as to the first allegedly criminal transaction but not as to the second must make a convincing showing that he has both important testimony to give concerning one offense and a strong need to refrain from testifying as to the other. In that neither defendant here advanced sufficient information…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. ShapiroNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. Dodge, New York County Courts1972
3Cited by291 opinions
- People v. CahillNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. BongarzoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Middleton v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. ShogaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. StreitferdtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
286 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.