Legal Opinion

People v. Maddox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 2000PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted following a jury trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) arising out of the execution of a search warrant at an apartment in the City of Geneva. There is no merit to the contention of defendant that he was deprived of a fair trial by the admission of evidence of uncharged crimes. It is well established that evidence of uncharged crimes may be admitted to establish the intent element of a crime (see, People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233, 245; People v Molineux, 168 NY 264,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. People v. AlvinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. CousartNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. PughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. BibbesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. CarsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. People v. KalinowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. People v. JurjensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API