Legal Opinion

People v. Perez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1991PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We conclude that the trial court did not err in failing to grant defendant’s request for an expanded charge on the evaluation of the identification evidence. Although we deem it "the better practice * * * to grant a defendant’s request and give the expanded charge” when appropriate (People v Whalen, 59 NY2d 273, 279), such a charge was not required in this case. It cannot be said that this case involved a "close question of identity” (id., at 278). The evidence of defendant’s identity included the testimony…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. KarabinasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. People v. WillisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. AcevedoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API