Legal Opinion

Eckman v. Beihl

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 9, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

The gravamen of plaintiffs suit, although styled in contract, to recover damages, is that defendants did, on April 25th, 1935, “willfully and maliciously” destroy his growing crop of rye, by ploughing it under, “m defiance of his right thereto.”

It appears that Elmer Smires and his wife, were tenants by the entireties of a farm near Browns Mills, Burlington county, New Jersey. They had executed a note, secured by a mortgage on the farm, to the Safeguard Finance Company. Subsequent to the execution and delivery of the note and mortgage, on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wood v. PriceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  2. Dieckman v. WalserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Samson v. . RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Francis Bros. v. SchallbergerOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Sawtelle v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. SAMUEL D. WASSERMAN, INC. v. KlahreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Venetsky v. West Essex Bldg. Supply Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. Potter v. HillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. AKC, INC. v. Joel Opatut Family TrustNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API