Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Chase

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.

There is authority for the proposition that if the bank itself had been the plaintiff, the defense last herein interposed could have been maintained: Agricultural Bank v. Robinson, 24 Me. 274; First Nat. Bank v. Felt, 100 Iowa, 680 (69 N. W. 1057).

It seems, howéver, to be well settled by the great weight of authority that where a bank commissioner or other statutory receiver takes over the assets of an insolvent bank for the purpose of liquidation, such defense is not available and the maker. of a note given, as this one confessedly was, to deceive the bank examiner into a false finding as to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lyons v. BenneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. State Bank v. KirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. First National Bank v. FeltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Moore v. KildallWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Agricultural Bank v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1844

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Schafer v. Fraser Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. James v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  5. Iglehart v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API