Legal Opinion
CIT Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1937No. 4152PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
By an order of the District Court an automobile, which had been seized by federal officers on the ground that it was being used for the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquors, was condemned and forfeited; and the prayer of the C. I. T. Corporation, which had a lien upon the car, that the forfeiture be remitted and mitigated under the authority conferred upon the court by section 204 of the Act of August 27, 1935, 49 Stat. 878 (27 U.S.C.A. § 40a), was refused. The question involved in this appeal is whether the power reposed in the court by the statute was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richbourg Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- CIT Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. One 1935 Chevrolet CoupeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1936
- United States v. One Plymouth Coupé, Engine No. PC 93353District Court, D. Maryland · 1936
- United States v. 1935 Ford Coupe, Engine No. 18—1654854District Court, D. Maine · 1936
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. ONE HUDSON COUPE, 1938 MODEL, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe CoachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. Automobile Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Metro Taxicabs, Inc. v. Tesorero de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
- United States v. One 1937 La Salle Sedan Automobile, Motor No. 2,234,769Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.