Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1935No. Civ. No. 9024PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

This is an action in which appellants, as plaintiffs, seek to recover the proceeds of two several life insurance policies issued April 21, 1926, and delivered April 28, 1926, on the life of Hazel Edna Johnson, deceased, the insured. Plaintiffs are the mother of the deceased, as administratrix of her estate, and the minor son of deceased by a former marriage. Defendant Granville William Johnson, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was the husband of deceased and the beneficiary named in the policies. Within a few days after the policies were issued, deceased, her minor son…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Goodwin v. Provident Savings Life Assurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. American Trust Co. v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Killian v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kincer v. Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Willie A. Davis v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, Charles S. Swanegan, Daisy Swanegan, and Lloyd W. Swanegan, as AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. Crump v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Mary F. Billington v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  5. United Fidelity Life Insurance v. EmertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API