Legal Opinion

Killian v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1929PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cardozo, Ch. J.

The defendant issued to George Killian its policy of insurance upon his life, dated November 28, 1923, payable to Victoria Killian, his wife, the insured being at liberty to change the beneficiaries. He did change them thereafter by indorsement on the policy. The insurance thus became payable to his wife and his four children, or the survivors, in equal shares. One of the clauses of the policy was the following: “ Incontestability — This policy (and the application therefor) constitutes the entire contract between the parties and, except for non-payment of premiums, shall be…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Wright v. Mutual Benefit Life Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Oswego Syracuse R.R. Co. v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. American Trust Co. v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Cohen v. . N.Y. Mutual Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. American Life Insurance v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Atlas Life Insurance v. W. I. Southern, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Protective Life Insurance v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Ulakovic v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API