Helen Ardelle, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Five Washington corporations — Helen Ardelle, Incorporated, Brown & Haley, Canterbury Candy Makers, Incorporated. Imperial Candy Company and Rogers Candy Company — ‘have petitioned this court to review and set aside orders of the Federal Trade Commission requiring them to cease and desist from certain practices which, the Commission holds, constitute an unfair method of competition in commerce, within the meaning of § '5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 719, 15 U.S.C.A. § 45.
Facts found by the Commission and not disputed by petitioners are as follows:
Petitio…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Trade Commission v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Federal Trade Commission v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State v. HudsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. Village of Garden CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Hill v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Maltz v. SaxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.