Legal Opinion

Heilbrunn v. Sun Chemical Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 5, 1959PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, Chief Justice:

This suit is brought by stockholders of Sun Chemical Corporation, a Delaware corporation, against Ansbacher-Siegle Corporation, a New York corporation, and Norman E. Alexander, President of Sun and owner of Ansbacher. Plaintiffs attack the validity of the purchase by Sun of all the assets of Ansbacher. The complaint states two grounds or causes of action: (1) that the transaction constituted a de jacto merger and is unlawful since the merger provisions of the Delaware law were not complied with; and (2) that the transaction “was tainted with self-interest,” i. e.,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Drug, Inc. v. HuntSupreme Court of Delaware · 1933
  3. Chicago Corp. v. MundsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  4. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  5. Lauman v. Lebanon Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Williams v. GeierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  2. Orzeck v. EnglehartSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
  3. Rath v. Rath Packing CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. Hariton v. Arco Electronics, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
  5. Pomierski v. W. R. Grace & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API