Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 18, 1952PublishedCited by 182 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, Chief Justice,

delivering opinion of the court:

The principal question presented is whether the terms of a proposed merger of Mayflower Hotel Corporation (herein “Mayflower”) into its parent corporation, Hilton Hotels Corporation (herein “Hilton”), are fair to the minority stockholders of Mayflower.

The essential facts are these:

Mayflower and Hilton are both Delaware corporations. Mayflower’s sole business is the ownership and operation of- the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D. C. It has outstanding 389,738 shares of common stock of $1 par value. Hilton and its subsidiary…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  2. Tri-Continental Corporation v. BattyeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
  3. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  4. Blish v. Thompson Automatic Arms Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1948
  5. Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  5. Orman v. CullmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2002

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API