Legal Opinion

Kohl's Illinois, Inc. v. Marion Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 2014No. 2013-1006PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} In this appeal, we review the holding of the Marion County Board of Revision (“BOR”) and the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) that the complaint filed by the property owner (Kohl’s Illinois, Inc. or Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc., referred to as “Kohl’s”) was “void” because the property at issue was subject to a tax-increment-financing (“TIF”) agreement that contained a covenant prohibiting the filing of a complaint. We conclude that any bar to the complaint that arises from the TIF agreement is not a jurisdictional restriction and that, as a result, the beneficiaries of the covenant had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Herbert v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Groveport Madison Local Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Snavely v. Erie County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Sugarcreek Township v. City of CentervilleOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Gammarino v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Obetz v. McClain (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  2. New Albany-Plain Local Schools Bd of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Orth v. State of Ohio, Dept. of EdnOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Fairfield Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Ginter v. Auglaize County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API