Ginter v. Auglaize County Board of Revision
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} This case concerns the discretionary authority of boards of revision to dismiss a valuation complaint for failure to prosecute based on the complainant’s failure to attend the scheduled hearing of the board. We conclude that boards of revision do not. have that authority, and we hold that a board of revision must make a determination of value whenever a complaint properly invokes its jurisdiction. Accordingly, we vacate the Board of Tax Appeals’ (“BTA’s”) decision and remand the cause to the Auglaize County Board of Revision for further proceedings.
Factual and Procedural Background
{¶ 2}…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Worthington City Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Akron City School District Board of Education v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Mason City School District Board of Education v. Warren County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Snavely v. Erie County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Swetland Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chiow v. Wood County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- Holman Rentals, L.L.C. v. Wood County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- Queen v. Wood County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2015