Briswalter v. Palomares
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order-refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
The plaintiff, in his complaint, alleges that the deed from Francisco Palomares to Trinidad Yorba, dated July 24, 1879, purporting to convey all his right, title and interest in San Jose rancho, for the expressed consideration of §6,000, although absolute on its face, conveyed no beneficial interest to the said Yorba, but the conveyance was to him in trust for said Francisco Palomares, and was made without consideration, and for the purpose of hindering, delaying and defrauding *260the creditors of said Palomares, and especially the plaintiff herein.
The court helow found :
“ The deed of conveyance…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Spanagel v. DellingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Hutchings v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Paige v. O'NealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Cohn v. MulfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ross v. WellmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- San Francisco Breweries v. SchurtzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894