Casey v. Leggett
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County and from an order denying a new trial. E. F. Crawford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER,C.
Action to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff. Motion for new trial denied. This appeal is from the judgment and order. On July 24, 1893, and prior thereto, one L. Frank Ciar was the owner and seised in fee of the lands in controversy; and was then in insolvent circumstances and owed, among others, one Adolph Sommer the sum of four thousand eight hundred dollars, besides interest. On said date the said L. Frank Ciar made a bargain and sale deed of said lands to his brother, Leo II. Ciar. On September 11, 1893, said Sommer assigned the indebtedness so due him from L. Frank Ciar to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Kyle v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Cushing v. PiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Lick v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Hyatt v. ColkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Noll v. BaidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.