Legal Opinion

Spooner v. Bay St. Louis Syndicate

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

• Appeal by the defendant corporation from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Lochren, J., presiding, appointing a receiver.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action was brought to have the property anal effects of the defendant corporation sequestrated, and a receiver of th&-same appointed, pursuant to Gen. St; 1878, c. 76, § 9. The materiali allegations of the complaint are that the plaintiff bad obtained im Hennepin county a judgment against the corporation for ■$1,239.68*. which was adjudged a specific lien upon certain real estate in that, county, which the sheriff was directed to sell for the satisfaction of: the judgment; that pursuant to such judgment the sheriff sold the.* premikes, realizing therefrom the sum of $5; that this sale…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Flint v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Swaney v. HasaraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Grossman v. Lockedell & SonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Spooner v. Bay of St. Louis SyndicateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API