Timm v. Schneider

I dissent. A careful reading of the record sIioavs that plaintiffs did not have a fair trial. It seems to me that a new trial should be had in the interest of justice. Quirk v. Consumers Power Co. 127 Minn. 526, 149 N. W. 193; I. J. Bartlett Co. v. Ness, 156 Minn. 407, 195 N. W. 39; State v. Hansen, 173 Minn. 158, 217 N. W. 146; Grossman v. Lockedell & Son, 184 Minn. 446, 238 N. W. 893.