Bronner v. Wetzlar
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order granting the defendant a new trial, in the Sixth District Court, County of Sacramento. Denson, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Thornton, J.:
This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. In an opinion which appears in the transcript, the learned Judge, in granting the motion, says: “ I am now convinced that in making the second finding of facts, the evidence was misapprehended, and did not justify said finding. The finding should have been to the effect that defendant collected the rents in his *420capacity as executor of the estate of John C. ICeenan, and not as agent of the estate of Hosanna, or the executor thereof.”
The defendant moved in the Court below for a new trial, on the ground, among others, that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Phelps v. Union Copper Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- In re the Estate of CarrigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Pierce v. BirkholmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Beeckenridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.