Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Union Copper Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870No. 1,790PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth District, City and County of San Francisco. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSprague, J.

This appeal is from an order of the Court below, granting a new trial, on motion of defendants, which motion was made upon notice, embracing all the statutory grounds of a motion for a new trial, followed by a statement of the evidence and specifications, stating wherein the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict, and special assignment of errors of law occurring at the trial, to which defendants duly excepted, and upon which they would rely on such motion.

In granting the defendants’ motion, the Court did not state the grounds upon which the motion Avas granted.

The action is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hall v. The Bark "Emily Banning"California Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Pierce v. SchadenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Bronner v. WetzlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Beeckenridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API