Beeckenridge v. Crocker
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Merced County granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Thornton J.
— This is an action to recover damages for the breach of an alleged agreement to sell and convey certain real property, known as Merced town property. The case was tried before a jury, and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff for ninety thousand dollars. The court below granted a new trial, and the appeal is from that order.
One of the grounds upon which the new trial was asked and granted was, that the verdict was contrary to law, the evidence, and the charge of the court to the jury.
The court granted the new trial upon the ground of insufficiency of the- evidence to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hall v. The Bark "Emily Banning"California Supreme Court · 1867
- Pierce v. SchadenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Bronner v. WetzlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Quinn v. KenyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bjorman v. Fort Bragg Redwood Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Curtiss v. Starr & Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
- In re the Estate of CarrigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Jones v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.