Legal Opinion
Boyd-Davis v. Macomber Law, PLLC
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 2015No. 41523PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Justice.
Terri Boyd-Davis appeals the decision of the Industrial Commission which concluded that Boyd-Davis failed to provide information requested by Idaho Department of Labor (IDOL) as required by IDAPA 09.01.30.425.07 and was therefore ineligible for unemployment benefits. We vacate the Commission’s decision and remand the matter to the Commission for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Boyd-Davis filed for unemployment compensation on January 27, 2013, and began receiving benefits. IDOL claims to have mailed an “online review letter”…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Rife v. LongIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HartIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Uhl v. Ballard Medical Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rangen, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Kennedy v. Hagadone Hospitality Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Waite v. Moto One KTM, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
- Watkins v. City of PonderayIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
- Rangen, Inc. v. Dept of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.