Balderston v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MOTZ, Judge.
The sole question presented in this appeal is whether voluntary home confinement, undertaken as a condition of probation, constitutes “custody” which must be considered for purposes of sentencing credit. Under the limited facts of this case, we hold that it does not. 1
Appellant, Ray Terry Balderston, pled guilty in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County (Messitte, J.) to driving while under the influence of alcohol. Appellant had four prior convictions for driving while intoxicated but had always been placed on probation and then resumed driving while intoxicated. Nevertheless,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- State v. SpeaksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ReynoldsArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. RamosIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. Joseph G. ZackularCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Dedo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Schlossman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- State v. ClimerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
- Dedo v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.