Legal Opinion

Dedo v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 31, 1996No. 109, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

The question we must decide in this case is whether Maryland Code (1957, 1992 Repl.Vol., 1995 Supp.) Art. 27, § 6380(a), 1 requires that a defendant be granted credit toward his sentence for the time he spent in home detention between his conviction and sentencing. We shall hold that the defendant was entitled to credit for time spent in home detention because he was committed to the custody of the Warden of the Wicomico County Detention Center (“WCDC”) and, under a home detention agreement, was subject to prosecution for escape for any unauthorized absence from his home.

Robert…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. State v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. ReyesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  4. Lock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Johnson v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Deville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. State v. RauchHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bush v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Harris v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API