State v. Parrish
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHusKiNS, J.
Defendant Parrish contends that the Talalah and Mansfield houses had been vacated and left open and the items of personal property located in them abandoned. He requested numerous special instructions with respect to abandoned property and assigns as error the court’s refusal to give them. We have reviewed the evidence and the requested instructions. There is no merit in defendant’s position. The Court of Appeals correctly held that there was no evidence which would justify or require instructions with respect to abandoned property.
Defendant filed a supplemental brief in this Court asserting,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Roberts v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Codianna v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. ElamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.