State v. Milano
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
For the reasons stated below, we find no error in defendant’s trial.
In his first assignment of error, the defendant claims he was denied effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
*494In a case dealing with a guilty plea entered on counsel’s advice, the United States Supreme Court has stated that the gauge of effective assistance of counsel is not “whether a court would retrospectively consider counsel’s advice to be right or wrong, but . . . whether that advice was within the range of competence…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Victor Dennis Marzullo v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- State v. ChanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. BiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- State v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. AlbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.