Castro v. Sanofi Pasteur Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ARLEO, District Judge
Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Class Experts [Dkt. No 337] and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification [Dkt. No. 309]. The Court conducted a Daubert hearing from September 9th to September 11th, 2015. Considering the testimony and briefing, the Court is convinced that Plaintiffs’ ex*826pert, Professor Einer Elhauge, cannot be excluded as unreliable. Plaintiffs have also presented proof common to the proposed class on all elements of their antitrust claim, so this class will be certified.
I. Facts
A. General Background
This case concerns…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023