Minnetonka Oil Co. v. Cleveland Vitrified Brick Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pawnee County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by the Minnetonka Oil Company, a corporation, against Cleveland Vitrified Brick Company, a corporation. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MATHEWS, C.
This action was instituted in the district court of Pawnee county by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error, based upon a Written contract made between the plaintiff and the Hammer Brick Company, and transferred to the defendant herein. To plaintiff’s petition, the defendant filed a demurrer, which was not passed upon for some reason not shown- in the record. Defendant afterwards answered, and plaintiff replied. The cause having come on to be tried upon the issues joined, the jury having been impaneled, and statements having been made by each party, when…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Mitchell v. MilhoanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Stoddard v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- State v. School District No. 3Supreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Marshall v. HomierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- McAtee v. Wes-Lee Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Taylor v. StarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- North Carolina Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928