Hall v. Sauntry
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from an'order of the district court for Itasca county, Holland, J., denying motions to amend the findings, for a new trial, and for judgment in favor of plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the Court
BUCK, J.1
Hall and Brown brought this action for the purpose of determining the adverse claims of the defendants to a quarter section of land situate in Itasca county. William Sauntry and wife, Frederick Weyerhaeuser and wife, and E. Rutledge and wife answered, alleging title in F. Weyerhaeuser and William Sauntry. The trial court found the following facts:(1) “That one Pierre Paul entered the land described in the complaint at the United States land office in Duluth, Minn., on the Gth day of October, A. D. 1873, to whom a patent was issued therefor, dated May 15, 1874, and duly recorded on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Berryhill v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- Minnesota Debenture Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Orr v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Eager v. Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern Express Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- West Missabe Land Co. v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- State ex rel. Coburn v. RiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.