State ex rel. Coburn v. Ries
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of Annie O. Coburn the district court for Ramsey county issued its alternative writ of mandamus, requiring George ,J. Ries, as county auditor for that county, to execute and deliver to relator a proper warrant upon the treasurer of the county in the sum «of $226.27, with interest, or show cause why he had not done so.
Read the full summary
Upon the relation of Annie O. Coburn the district court for Ramsey county issued its alternative writ of mandamus, requiring George ,J. Ries, as county auditor for that county, to execute and deliver to relator a proper warrant upon the treasurer of the county in the sum «of $226.27, with interest, or show cause why he had not done so. The respondents made return and the matter was heard before Stanton, J., who granted relator’s order for judgment in her favor on the pleadings. Erom the judgment and decree entered pursuant to the •order for judgment, respondents appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the county auditor of Bamsey county to. issue to relator a warrant on the county treasurer for $226.27 in refundment of the amount paid by relator for certificates of tax sales, with interest. When the answer came in relator moved for judgment on the pleadings. This motion was-granted, and defendants appealed from the judgment directing a peremptory writ to issue.
The following facts are disclosed by the pleadings upon which the-order for judgment was based.
In May, 1908, Lot 23, Hewitt’s Outlots, First Division, and “west one-half of the vacated…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re Ellis' EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Oswald v. Minneapolis Times Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Wilder v. DeCouSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Town of Hinckley v. Kettle River RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Prignitz v. FischerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nitkey v. S. T. McKnight Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937