Legal Opinion

D & M HEALTHCARE, INC. v. Kernan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2003No. 49S05-0310-CV-437PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

House Enrolled Act 1866 as passed by the 2001 General Assembly would prohibit the Family and Social Services Administration ("FSSA") from adopting rules that would reduce reimbursements to nursing facilities. The bill was passed by both houses but the Governor vetoed it and delivered the bill back to the House after the legislative session had adjourned. The Plaintiffs are several nursing home facilities who seek a declaratory judgment that House Enrolled Act 1866 became law despite the Governor's veto. The Plaintiffs claim that the Governor's veto, subsequently sustained by a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. International Business MacHines Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Indiana State Board of Education v. Brownsburg Community School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. In Re Contempt of Wabash Valley Hospital, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Stoffel v. DanielsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Marion County Ex Rel. Peterson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API