Jones v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Fayette. Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The appellant was charged in the indictment upon which he was tried with the crime of rape, but was convicted of assault and battery.
A question was asked the principal witness for the State, which was not objected to, and it is insisted that as no objection was interposed to the question the appellant had no right to move to strike out the answer of the witness. This is an untenable position. The question was in form and substance a proper one, and, of course, could not have been successfully assailed, so that an objection would have been unavailing. The appellant, therefore, did not lose the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Gould v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Pape v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Mills v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- State v. LindseyNevada Supreme Court · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Roddy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Henderson v. ColemanWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
- Rushing v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.