Legal Opinion
Portland Audubon Society v. Lujan
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 8, 1992No. Civ. 87-1160-FRPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRYE, District Judge:
The matters before the court are 1) the renewed motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment (#739); and 2) the motion of defendant to vacate preliminary injunction (# 755).
FACTS
Between 1979 and 1983, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) formulated a ten-year Timber Management Plan for each of its seven western districts in the State of Oregon. In these Timber Management Plans, the BLM has designated the commercial forest land which is under its management for one of several uses. In these Timber Management Plans, the BLM does not designate specific timber sale…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Seattle Audubon Society v. LyonsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
- Oregon Natural Resources Council Action v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1999
- Sierra Club v. BosworthDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Northwest Forest Resource Council v. Michael Dombeck, Acting Director, Bureau of Land Management, and Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Fund for Animals v. HallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.