Legal Opinion

Seattle Audubon Society v. Lyons

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 21, 1994No. C92-479WD, C94-758WD, C94-803WD and C94-820WDPublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE 1994 FOREST PLAN

DWYER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The legality of a forest management plan adopted by the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior must be decided in these consol idated cases. Among the federal lands in Washington, Oregon, and Northern California are about twenty-four million acres that are within the geographic range of the northern spotted owl. The plan to manage this large area was adopted in response to orders entered in this litigation (see Seattle Audubon Soc’y v. Moseley, 798 F.Supp. 1484 (W.D.Wa.1992), aff'd sub nom., Seattle…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Colorado Environmental Coalition v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Ass'n v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund v. BrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Southeast Conference v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. American Forest Resource Council v. SheaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API