Legal Opinion

Bruch v. Firestone Tire And Rubber Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 25, 1987No. 86-1448PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

828 F.2d 134

56 USLW 2140, 8 Employee Benefits Ca 2373

BRUCH, Richard, Chubb, John R. and Schade, Albert and

Schollenberger, Richard and Smith, Ronald R. and Smolinski,

Leonard A. In their individual capacities and as

representatives of the class of former, salaried, non-union

employees of the Firestone Plastics Division which was sold

to the Hooker Chemical Division of the Occidental Petroleum

Corporation, Appellants,

v.

FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY and Firestone Tire &

Rubber Company Retirement Plan for Salaried

Employees and Firestone Tire & Rubber

Company Stock Purchase and

Savings Plan, Appellees.

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hebra A. Berry v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Harry Jung, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. Robert W. Heidgerd v. Olin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. Luby v. Teamsters Health, Welfare, & Pension Trust FundsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. Reichelt v. Emhart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API