Legal Opinion
Migias v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 25, 1958No. Civ. A. 13469PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought suit against the Government under the Federal Tort Claims Act. In its answer, the Government admits that jurisdiction of this court is conferred under the provisions of that Act, being 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b). After the suit was filed, defendant by motion and order under Eule 14 brought in M. A. Malamos and George C. Atsalis, individ ually and trading as Malamos & Atsalis, a partnership, as third party defendants.
The facts and the conclusions of law will be found in this opinion pursuant to the provisions of Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Brown v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Scalise v. F. M. Venzie Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Potere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chesler v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- McClinton v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Quinones v. TOWNSHIP OF UPPER MORELAND, ETC., PA.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Wiseman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.