Legal Opinion
McConnell v. United States
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided August 7, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 2256PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
Judgment was entered herein on May 6, 1970 adversely to the contentions of the plaintiffs. Thirteen days afterward, on May 19, 1970, they made motions, first, to have the verdict of the jury set aside and to have judgment entered in accordance with their motion for a directed verdict, Rule 50(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in the alternative, for a new trial, Rule 59(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
A motion under Rule 50(b), swpra, may not be made later than 10 days after entry of Judgment. Johnson v. New York, New Haven &…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. KaiserSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Associates D/B/A Slazenger, and Dunlop Slazenger Corporation AKA Dunlop Sports CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Derosia v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Albano v. Bonanza International Development Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- Pamela Sue Rulo Sadowski v. Bombardier LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Russell v. Pride Convenience, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.