Legal Opinion
Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 1, 1943No. 332PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mubphy
The question in this ease is whether petitioner appealed to the Circuit Court of Appeals within the time provided by law (28 U. S. C. §230).
This is a suit brought by petitioner for infringement of certain claims of a reissue patent. The district court made findings of fact that the claims in issue did not embody any invention over the prior art and entered judgment dismissing the complaint on May 1, 1941. On May 28, 1941, after securing an enlargement of time under Rule 6 (b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure (28 U. S. C. A. following § 723c), petitioner filed a motion under Rule 52 (b) 1…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Department of Banking of Neb. v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Zimmern v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Morse v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Citizens Bank of Michigan City v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Hohn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Missouri v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Crescent Amusement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Wolpe v. PoretskyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Edward T. Hulson and Walter A. Christensen v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.