Russell v. Pride Convenience, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
In response to special questions, the jury found that the defendant had operated its store negligently so as to cause the plaintiff to slip and fall on an unnatural accumulation of snow and ice. Thereafter, the trial judge allowed the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The defendant had mailed that motion to the plaintiff and the court on the tenth day after entry of the judgment on the jury’s verdict. The plaintiff argues on appeal that, because the motion was not filed in court until the elev enth day after entry of the judgment, it was not timely under…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Associates D/B/A Slazenger, and Dunlop Slazenger Corporation AKA Dunlop Sports CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Chavoor v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Sullivan v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- F.W. Webb Co. v. AverettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Tynan v. NelsonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
- Barrett v. Lynn Ladder & Scaffolding Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1994
- Lewis v. McAlpineMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
- Cosentino v. Herbert H. Landy InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998