Legal Opinion

Moore v. . Hinnant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1884PublishedCited by 20 opinions

PETITION by defendant for modification of judgment, beard at February Term, 1884, of The Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMerrimoN, J.

This was a controversy submitted without action in the superior court of Johnston county, wherein judgment was rendered for the plaintiff sustaining the validity of the deed in trust in question, and upon appeal to this court, the judgment of the court below was affirmed. See 89 N. C., 455.

At the present term the defendant filed his petition praying the court to amend and modify its judgment entered at the last term, and to direct that the ease be remanded to the superior court to the end that “an issue may be framed and submitted to a jury, as to tha intent with which the deed of assignment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. . HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Albers v. WhitneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1840
  3. Brush v. RobbinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1844
  4. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
  5. Gibson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bisanar v. . SuttlemyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Cook v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Mann v. . MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Turrentine v. . Richmond Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Knowles v. Savage.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API