Legal Opinion

Taylor v. United States National Bank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1968PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

We are called upon in this case to construe a prenuptial agreement.

Maudie A. Taylor, widow of Henry B. Taylor, deceased, filed a petition in the probate court for an order directing the executor of her late husband’s estate to pay to her the sum of $650 per month for a period of one year subsequent to April 29, 1966, to be used for the support of the petitioner and to allow her to continue in possession rent-free of the dwelling of the decedent for a period of one year from his death.

The defendant executor pleaded the prenuptial agreement as a bar and the court, after a hearing, granted the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Landers v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Wickersham v. ComerfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Moore v. SchermerhornOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. In re the Estate of NoahCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bauer v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Merrill v. Estate of MerrillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Daywalt v. BertrandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API