Legal Opinion
Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. State
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 2013No. UP 3303; CA A143552; SC S059971PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.
The Department of Corrections (DOC), a public employer, made changes to its employees’ scheduled days off and their shift stop and start times without first bargaining with representatives of the employees’ union, the Association of Oregon Corrections Employees (AOCE). As an affirmative defense to AOCE’s ensuing complaint alleging that DOC had committed an unfair labor practice, DOC asserted that the terms of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement (CBA) permitted its unilateral action. The Employment Relations Board (ERB) rejected DOC’s argument and concluded that DOC had committed an…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Great American Insurance v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Deschutes County v. Pink Pit, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Windmill Inns of America, Inc. v. CauvinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Lowes v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 2025
- Portland Fire Fighters' Assn. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.