Miller v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
1. While it is true that all persons who are interested in sustaining or reversing the judgment of the court below are indispensable parties in the appellate courts, and they must be made parties to the bill of exceptions or the same will be dismissed (Emanuel Farm Co. v. Batts, 176 Ga. 552, 168 S. E. 316; Poston v. Durham, 177 Ga. 870, *310171 S. E. 765; Civil Code (1910), § 6176), yet, where this is not done, and the plaintiff in error seeks to amend the bill of exceptions by adding thereto the names of the parties below who are proper defendants in error in this court, and procures from…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Emanuel Farm Co. v. BattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Miller v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- American Grocery Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Steadman v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Mitchell v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Broun v. Bank of EarlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Tatum v. TatumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Allen v. Community Loan & Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Christian Construction Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Tingle v. CateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.